Celestial hemisphere:  Northern  ·  Constellation: Taurus (Tau)  ·  Contains:  24 Tau  ·  25 Tau)  ·  25 eta Tau  ·  Alcyone  ·  HD23511  ·  HD23584  ·  HD23585  ·  HD23607  ·  HD23631  ·  HD23632  ·  HD23642  ·  HD23713  ·  HD23733  ·  HD23763  ·  HD282967  ·  HD282970  ·  HD282973  ·  M 45  ·  Pleiades  ·  The star Alcyone (η Tau
Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
Alcyone - something a bit different and some help please! Taken at full moon..., Simon
Powered byPixInsight

Alcyone - something a bit different and some help please! Taken at full moon...

Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
Alcyone - something a bit different and some help please! Taken at full moon..., Simon
Powered byPixInsight

Alcyone - something a bit different and some help please! Taken at full moon...

Equipment

Loading...

Acquisition details

Loading...

Description

I have long had a concern about the shapes of my stars on the peripherals of my images when using the Classic Cassegrain. There often appears to be a lot of coma, too. This seemed odd, as that is normally the case for fast scopes, not f12s! Having got in touch with a specialist, it appears as though the primary mirror itself, runs at probably f3 hence the coma, and of course this scope is not really meant for the imaging I am forcing it to do! So, I suggested a coma corrector and to use that with the 0.75% reducer I have for the scope, which makes it run at f9 and my preference. The specialist felt it was unlikely to work - but as you can see I think, all things being equal, the stars are pretty good.


However, when I tried this last night with a Ha filter, I could not reproduce this result. I fiddled around for ages in -2C temperature but could not repeat what I got here, and what I got for my M46 too - the next one posted. So, it seems to work for a UV-IR filter, but not Ha - it does not seem to make any sense to me. I just think I got lucky, and it all seems a bit hit and miss to me. So, has anyone got any ideas how to get my scope running at f9, with less peripheral star issues please. I would even accept a post-processing method if there is one - although fixing the source issue would be best.

Anyway, I took this image whilst it was a full moon, hence the lack of nebulosity, because I could 'waste' the night if you see what I mean. It was a nightmare to process too, because of the gradients etc. This was 130 subs at 1 minute long each. This equates to  2 hours 10 minutes. Thanks everyone for your support...

Comments

Sky plot

Sky plot

Histogram

Alcyone - something a bit different and some help please! Taken at full moon..., Simon